Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2
Detailed comparison of API pricing, technical specifications, and benchmark scores. Updated 2026-07-04.
Cost at a Glance
Claude Fable 5 is 9.5× more expensive than GLM-5.2 — switching could save 89.5% on your monthly API bill.
At 5M input + 2M output tokens per month:
Choosing GLM-5.2 could save you $134.20/mo
Price Comparison (per 1M tokens)
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $10.00 | $1.40 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $50.00 | $4.40 |
| Cache Write (per 1M tokens) | $12.50 | — |
| Cache Read (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | $0.26 |
| Batch Input (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | — |
| Batch Output (per 1M tokens) | $25.00 | — |
Prices are per 1 million tokens. Actual costs depend on your monthly token volume. Use the calculator →
Specifications
| Spec | Claude Fable 5 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128K | 128K |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2026-04 | 2026-06 |
| Modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Prompt Caching | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | Yes | No |
| Thinking / Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 88.7 | 62.1 |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.5 | 86.0 |
| HumanEval | 96.3 | 97.0 |
Benchmark scores from official provider reports. Higher is better. Missing scores indicate the provider has not published that benchmark yet.
Use Cases
Claude Fable 5
GLM-5.2
About the Providers
Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic. GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI. This is a cross-provider comparison between Anthropic and Zhipu AI models. For the most up-to-date pricing, always check the official API documentation from each provider.