Claude Fable 5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Detailed comparison of API pricing, technical specifications, and benchmark scores. Updated 2026-07-04.
Cost at a Glance
Claude Fable 5 is 136.4× more expensive than Llama 4 Scout — switching could save 99.3% on your monthly API bill.
At 5M input + 2M output tokens per month:
Choosing Llama 4 Scout could save you $148.90/mo
Price Comparison (per 1M tokens)
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $10.00 | $0.10 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $50.00 | $0.30 |
| Cache Write (per 1M tokens) | $12.50 | — |
| Cache Read (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | — |
| Batch Input (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | — |
| Batch Output (per 1M tokens) | $25.00 | — |
Prices are per 1 million tokens. Actual costs depend on your monthly token volume. Use the calculator →
Specifications
| Spec | Claude Fable 5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M | 10M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128K | 16K |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2026-04 | 2025-04 |
| Modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Prompt Caching | Yes | No |
| Batch API | Yes | No |
| Thinking / Reasoning | Yes | No |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 88.7 | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 88.5 | 74.3 |
| HumanEval | 96.3 | 32.8 |
Benchmark scores from official provider reports. Higher is better. Missing scores indicate the provider has not published that benchmark yet.
Use Cases
Claude Fable 5
Llama 4 Scout
About the Providers
Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic. Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta. This is a cross-provider comparison between Anthropic and Meta models. For the most up-to-date pricing, always check the official API documentation from each provider.