DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
Detailed comparison of API pricing, technical specifications, and benchmark scores. Updated 2026-06-29.
Cost at a Glance
Llama 4 Maverick is 6.3× more expensive than DeepSeek V4 Flash — switching could save 84.3% on your monthly API bill.
At 5M input + 2M output tokens per month:
Choosing DeepSeek V4 Flash could save you $6.74/mo
Price Comparison (per 1M tokens)
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.80 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.28 | $2.00 |
| Cache Write (per 1M tokens) | $0.14 | — |
| Cache Read (per 1M tokens) | $0.00 | — |
| Batch Input (per 1M tokens) | — | — |
| Batch Output (per 1M tokens) | — | — |
Prices are per 1 million tokens. Actual costs depend on your monthly token volume. Use the calculator →
Specifications
| Spec | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 64K | 64K |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2026-05 | 2026-03 |
| Modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Prompt Caching | No | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Thinking / Reasoning | No | No |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.0 | 72.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5 | 81.0 |
| HumanEval | 91.2 | 89.0 |
Benchmark scores from official provider reports. Higher is better. Missing scores indicate the provider has not published that benchmark yet.
Use Cases
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
About the Providers
DeepSeek V4 Flash is developed by DeepSeek. Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta. This is a cross-provider comparison between DeepSeek and Meta models. For the most up-to-date pricing, always check the official API documentation from each provider.