Qwen 3.7 Max vs Llama 4 Maverick
Detailed comparison of API pricing, technical specifications, and benchmark scores. Updated 2026-07-04.
Cost at a Glance
Qwen 3.7 Max is 3.4× more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick — switching could save 70.9% on your monthly API bill.
At 5M input + 2M output tokens per month:
Choosing Llama 4 Maverick could save you $19.50/mo
Price Comparison (per 1M tokens)
| Metric | Qwen 3.7 Max | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $2.50 | $0.80 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $7.50 | $2.00 |
| Cache Write (per 1M tokens) | — | — |
| Cache Read (per 1M tokens) | — | — |
| Batch Input (per 1M tokens) | $1.25 | — |
| Batch Output (per 1M tokens) | $3.75 | — |
Prices are per 1 million tokens. Actual costs depend on your monthly token volume. Use the calculator →
Specifications
| Spec | Qwen 3.7 Max | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128K | 64K |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2026-05 | 2026-03 |
| Modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Prompt Caching | Yes | No |
| Batch API | Yes | No |
| Thinking / Reasoning | Yes | No |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Qwen 3.7 Max | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.4 | 72.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 89.6 | 81.0 |
| HumanEval | 87.2 | 89.0 |
Benchmark scores from official provider reports. Higher is better. Missing scores indicate the provider has not published that benchmark yet.
Use Cases
Qwen 3.7 Max
Llama 4 Maverick
About the Providers
Qwen 3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba. Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta. This is a cross-provider comparison between Alibaba and Meta models. For the most up-to-date pricing, always check the official API documentation from each provider.