Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-5.3 Codex
Detailed comparison of API pricing, technical specifications, and benchmark scores. Updated 2026-07-04.
Cost at a Glance
GPT-5.3 Codex is 38.6× more expensive than Llama 4 Scout — switching could save 97.4% on your monthly API bill.
At 5M input + 2M output tokens per month:
Choosing Llama 4 Scout could save you $41.40/mo
Price Comparison (per 1M tokens)
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.10 | $2.50 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.30 | $15.00 |
| Cache Write (per 1M tokens) | — | $3.13 |
| Cache Read (per 1M tokens) | — | $0.25 |
| Batch Input (per 1M tokens) | — | $1.25 |
| Batch Output (per 1M tokens) | — | $7.50 |
Prices are per 1 million tokens. Actual costs depend on your monthly token volume. Use the calculator →
Specifications
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 10M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 16K | 128K |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2025-04 | 2025-10 |
| Modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Prompt Caching | No | Yes |
| Batch API | No | Yes |
| Thinking / Reasoning | No | No |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 82.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 74.3 | 83.0 |
| HumanEval | 32.8 | 94.5 |
Benchmark scores from official provider reports. Higher is better. Missing scores indicate the provider has not published that benchmark yet.
Use Cases
Llama 4 Scout
GPT-5.3 Codex
About the Providers
Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta. GPT-5.3 Codex is developed by OpenAI. This is a cross-provider comparison between Meta and OpenAI models. For the most up-to-date pricing, always check the official API documentation from each provider.